TFL Vsebine / Revija Javna uprava

Zaradi temeljnega sistemskega načela vezanosti uprave na zakon in na usmerjanje s strani najvišjih nosilcev izvršne oblasti, je pravna ureditev postopkov odločanja upravnih organov, pa tudi sodišč v okviru sodnega nadzora nad delovanjem uprave, vselej ekstenzivno pristopala k zakonskemu določanju različnih pravnih sredstev ter možnosti njihove uporabe. Pravna sredstva upravnega procesnega prava pa poznajo tudi svoje omejitve, saj preveliko število in načinov uporabe pravnih sredstev ne prispeva k ustavnim ali sistemskih zahtevam učinkovitega varstva pravic posameznika, ob tem pa posega v pravne vrednote kot so pravna varnost, odločanje v razumnem roku in varstvo pravnomočnosti pravno urejenih razmerij med posameznikom in državo. S tega vidika je treba preučiti možnosti njihovega omejevanja s ciljem iskanja ravnotežja med potrebo po učinkovitih pravnih sredstvih posameznikov pa tudi med drugimi pravnimi vrednotami, ki so prisotne v družbi.

The principle of legality of administrative action and the systemic need for guidance and policy setting of administration by the highest bodies of executive authority has led to extensive approach to regulation of legal remedies and judicial review of acts of administration. The possibilities of implementation of legal remedies of administrative procedural law on the other hand also have their limits, since its excessive use does not contribute to constitutional or systemic requirements of effective protection of rights of individuals and has adverse effect on legal values as legal certainty, decision-making in reasonable time and the protection of finality of legally regulated relations between the individual and the State. From this perspective it is important to analyze the possibilities of their limitation with the goal of achieving balance between the need for effective legal protection of citizens and other legal values present in the society.