TFL Vsebine / Revija Javna uprava

V praksi je obnova postopka eno izmed najpogosteje uporabljenih izrednih pravnih sredstev v upravnem postopku. Eden izmed temeljnih pogojev za obnovo postopka je, da je bil postopek končan z dokončno odločbo, zoper katero v upravnem postopku ni rednega pravnega sredstva. Pravilo o tem, da obnova postopka zoper sklep, izdan v upravnem postopku, ni dopustna, bi moralo brez izjem veljati za vse procesne sklepe, drugačna obravnava pa bi morala veljati le za tiste sklepe, ki so po svoji vsebini odločbe. Presojo o tem, ali je določen sklep po vsebini odločba, bi bilo potrebno opraviti izključno na podlagi izreka določenega akta ob hkratnem zavedanju, da ekstenzivno širjenje dovoljenosti obnove postopka za konkretne primere zoper sklepe, ki so sicer procesne narave, ni dopustno. Ureditev, ki ne dopušča obnove postopka zoper sklep, v ničemer ne predstavlja nerazumne omejitve dostopa do pravnega sredstva.

In practice, the renewal of the proceeding is one of the most frequently used extraordinary legal remedies in the administrative procedure. One of the basic conditions for a renewal of a proceeding is that the proceeding was completed with a final decision on the merit against which there is no regular remedy in the administrative procedure. The rule that the renewal of a proceeding against an order issued in an administrative procedure is inadmissible should, without exception, apply to all procedural orders. Different treatment should apply only to those orders that are decisions on the merit in their content. An assessment on a legal nature of an order should be performed exclusively on the basis of operative part of the decision with awareness that extension of a renewal of the proceeding in concrete cases against procedural orders is not permissible. An arrangement that does not provide the renewal of proceedings against an order does not constitute an unreasonable restriction to the access to a legal remedy.

The Renewal of Administrative Proceeding Completed by Order