TFL Vsebine / Revija Revus

Neodvisnost, nepristranskost in nevtralnost pri razsojanju. Avtor obravnava več razsežnosti neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti. Med drugim trdi, da je pojma (oba sta tesno povezana z vladavino prava) mogoče razumeti kot vrednoti in da sta eden od drugega povsem razločljiva. Posebej oriše še takšno pojmovanje nevtralnosti, ki slednjo razume kot tretjo, od neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti ločeno vrednoto. Zaključi, da morajo biti sodniki in arbitri hkrati neodvisni, nepristranski in nevtralni. Vsaka od teh vrednot na svoj način prispeva k temu, da pravo lahko v zapletenih in pluralnih družbah odigrava zase značilno vlogo: tj. da omogoča družbeno sožitje.

This paper presents an analysis of the various dimensions of independence and impartiality. Among other things, I will argue that the two concepts, both of which are profoundly implicated in the rule of law, can be conceived as values and are perfectly distinguishable from each other. I will also propose a conception of neutrality, as a third distinct value that satisfies the requirement for non-redundancy with regard to independence and impartiality. Hence, judges and arbitrators must be independent, impartial and neutral. Each of these values contributes in different ways to enabling the law to fulfil its distinctive function of facilitating social interaction in complex and plural societies.