Portal TFL
Coercion, function, and the “why” of law
O AVTORJU
Frederick W. Thomas Professor of Law and Philosophy, University of Minnesota (USA)
AVTOR
Brian H. Bix
SOAVTOR
TIP DOKUMENTA
Strokovni članki
KLJUČNE BESEDE
coercion, sanction, conceptual analysis, functional analysis, Finnis (John), Greenberg (Mark)
KEYWORDS
NASLOV SEKCIJE
Symposium on law and coercion
SECTION
PUBLIKACIJA
Revija Revus
ŠTEVILKA PUBLIKACIJE ABS
45
LETO
2021
ZALOŽNIK
Klub Revus - Center za raziskovanje evropske Ustavnosti in demokracije
POVZETEK
In Coercion and the Nature of Law, Kenneth Einar Himma offers a methodical analysis of the role of coercion in understanding the nature of law. Himma’s work combines conceptual analysis, artifact theory, and functional analysis, ultimately concluding that for a social system to be “law” it must include coercive sanctions. The present article offers an overview of Himma’s arguments, ultimately focusing on the discussion about law’s function. In considering the problem of law’s function, the article contrasts Himma’s view with the views of John Finnis and Mark Greenberg.
SUMMARY
TITLE
Za ogled celotnega dokumenta je potrebna prijava v portal.
Začnite z najboljšim.
VSE NA ENEM MESTU.