TFL Vsebine / Pravni letopis

Pred sprejemanjem prava EU za svoje pravo se je seveda mogoče ubraniti s številnimi miti,ki jih marsikdaj nekritično negujemo. Razlike med nacionalnim pravnim redom in pravnim redom EU vsekakor obstajajo, vendar ne bi smele pomeniti razloga za odklanjanje prava EU, ampak priložnost za iskanje načinov, kako ustvarjati presečne množice in na drugi strani pošteno utemeljiti nekatere trmaste posebnosti, ki si jih lahko privošči vsaka država članica. Oboje je mogoče iskati tudi skozi pravila, ki so oblikovana v Nomotehničnih smernicah.

It is of course possible to defend oneself against embracing EU law as our own law with many myths, which we often cultivate uncritically. Certainly, there are differences between the national legal order and the EU legal order, but rather than be a reason for the rejection of the latter, they should be an opportunity to find ways to create intersections of sets, and, on the other hand, a fair justification for some stubborn peculiarities that each member state may afford. Both can also be found through the application of the legislative drafting rules.

Intersections of Sets and Stubborn Peculiarities of Legislative Drafting Rules when Two Legal Orders Confront Each Other