TFL Vsebine / Pravni letopis

Sedanji režimi nepogodbene odškodninske odgovornosti so globoko ukoreninjeni v evropske in svetovne pravne redove. Odgovornost proizvajalca, objektivna in krivdna odgovornost, odgovornost za drugega in drugi režimi odgovornosti so instituti, katerih stalnost kaže na njihovo zmožnost, da pokrijejo vse mogoče primere nepogodbene škode, ki si jih človeku uspe zamisliti. Pa so ti uveljavljeni temelji civilnega prava ustrezni tudi, ko vznikne nov povzročitelj škode – umetna inteligenca? Pravna stroka ponuja pritrdilne in odklonilne odgovore. Nekateri bi le priredili sedanje režime, drugi menijo, da bo potrebna uvedba novih institutov. Strinjajo pa se, da je za optimalen izkoristek prednosti, ki jih umetna inteligenca ponuja, nujno, da pravo njen razvoj budno spremlja.

The established non-contractual liability regimes are deeply embedded both in European legal systems and worldwide. The continuity of product liability, strict and fault liability, and vicarious liability, as well as other established types of liability, shows their ability to cover every possible case of damage one can think of. Are these pillars of civil law effective, however, when a new injuring party – artificial inteligence – emerges? Legal scholars provide both affirmative and dissenting answers to this question. Some would only adapt the current framework of civil liability, others claim that new legal constructs need to be established. Despite their differences, however, most scholars agree, that in order to maximize the advantages of artificial inteligence, law needs to closely follow its evolution.

Non-contractual liability and artificial intelligence