TFL Vsebine / Pravni letopis

Prispevek obravnava elemente nekompenzatorne odškodnine v domačem pravnem redu, pri čemer se osredotoča na pravna sredstva, ki jih najdemo zunaj okvira splošnega obligacijskega prava, torej na posebnih pravnih področjih. Ta pravna sredstva pogosto vstopajo v domač pravni red na podlagi prenosa prava EU, zato je nujno poznavanje evropske zakonodaje in sodne prakse SEU glede pravnih sankcij za kršitev prava EU. Glede na to je ključna t. i. triada načel – učinkovitosti, sorazmernosti in odvračilnosti. Iz obravnavanih primerov vidimo, da v slovenski zakonodaji obstajajo določbe, ki odkrito želijo doseči odvračilni namen, vendar je njihova odvračilnost v praksi vprašljiva. Instituti, za katere bi na podlagi terminologije lahko domnevali, da gre za institute, ki želijo doseči namen prevencije in morebiti tudi kaznovanja, so v praksi pogosto oblikovani in razlagani tako, da te namene težko dosežejo.

The paper discusses elements of non-compensatory damages in the domestic legal order, focusing on legal remedies that are found outside the framework of general law of obligations, i.e. in specific legal areas. These legal remedies often enter the legal landscape on the basis of the transposition of EU law, therefore familiarity with EU legislation and the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU regarding legal sanctions for breaches of EU law is essential. In this light, the so-called triad of principles - effectiveness, proportionality and deterrenceplays an important role. The analysis shows that there are provisions in the Slovenian legislation that openly pursue a deterrent purpose, but their deterrence in practice is questionable. Institutes that, based on the terminology, could be assumed to pursue the purpose of prevention and possibly also punishment are often designed and interpreted in such a way that they hardly achieve these purposes in practice.

Non-compensatory damages