TFL Vsebine / Zbornik znanstvenih razprav

Evropski steber socialnih pravic, ki so ga novembra 2017 razglasili predsedniki Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta Evropske unije in Evropske komisije, vzpostavlja 20 temeljnih načel, ki obsegajo tri vsebinske sklope: Enake možnosti in dostop do trga dela (1 do 4), Pošteni delovni pogoji (5 do 10) in Socialna zaščita ter vključenost (11 do 20). Načela Evropskega stebra socialnih pravic, namenjena razvoju poštenih in dobro delujočih trgov dela in sistemov socialne varnosti v Evropi, so zapisana v jeziku pravic in, kot ugotavljajo avtorji, bralca spominjajo na listino. Vendarle pa je dokumentu, ki zahteva nadaljnjo normodajno aktivnost pristojnih institucij EU, praviloma pripisana lastnost mehkega prava ali narava političnega dokumenta.

The author interprets equality of opportunity as individuals’ equal access to primary goods, such as income, wealth, education, health regardless of personal circumstances, natural endowments, and constrains and establishes free movement of EU citizens as persons, not workers or self-employed persons, as a supranational principle of justice. More precisely, the author claims that free movement, regardless of citizens’ economic activity or possession of mobile or exportable marketable skills, represents a valid result produced by the supranational application of the fair equality of opportunity principle within the setting of the expending European Union. Primary goods of sufficient value or quality are needed for the individual to develop a rational life plan autonomously and to lead his or her life according to an autonomous conception of the good life with as little adjustment in his or her rational desires as possible. Since the level of adjustment or adaptation varies among the Member States and is, among other, dependent on the level of its social and economic development (e.g. the development of the public services individuals can access), fictitious EU citizens, when placed behind the veil of ignorance, are strongly motivated to neutralise adverse effects of belonging to Member States show- casing a low level of development. From an ex ante position of the rational future EU citizen, free movement, followed by the second-best result of intra-Member State redistribution, neutralises such adverse effects. Focusing on Principle 3 of the European Pillar of Social Rights, the author endeavours to establish whether the soft-law document allows for or possibly even promotes a reading, which merges the notion of equal opportunities with the idea of free movement, or does it, conversely, adhere to a Member-State-level promotion of equal opportunities, following the idea of market mobility of EU citizens and the current structure of the European Social Model.